Federal Budget 2026: What the New CGT & Negative Gearing Changes Mean for Property Investors
The Federal Budget could represent the biggest shake-up for Australian property investors in more than two decades.
The key takeaway is simple:
Property investing is not being abolished but the tax advantages attached to buying existing properties are being significantly reduced.
The Albanese Government has confirmed sweeping reforms to negative gearing and capital gains tax (CGT), with the goal of redirecting investor demand toward new housing construction and improving affordability for first-home buyers.
The Biggest Changes for Property Investors
1. Negative Gearing Will Be Restricted
From 1 July 2027:
Investors purchasing existing properties will no longer be able to use negative gearing to reduce their personal income tax.
Negative gearing concessions will remain available for:
New builds
Build-to-rent projects
Selected government-backed housing developments
Importantly, existing investors are expected to be grandfathered, meaning anyone who already owns an investment property should retain their current tax treatment.
What This Means Practically
For decades, investors have accepted short-term losses because they could offset them against PAYG income.
That strategy now becomes far less attractive for established properties.
As a result, investor demand may shift toward:
Off-the-plan apartments
House-and-land packages
New townhouse developments
At the same time:
Older investment stock may become less appealing
Cash flow and rental yield will matter more than tax deductions
Investors may become more selective about locations and asset quality
2. Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Is Changing
The current system which provides a 50% CGT discount after holding a property for more than 12 months will be replaced by:
An inflation-indexed system
A new 30% minimum tax rate on capital gains
This is a major shift because Australian property investing has historically relied heavily on long-term capital growth combined with concessional CGT treatment.
Why This Matters
The new rules could fundamentally change investor behaviour.
Investors may:
Hold property longer
Focus on stronger yielding assets
Become more selective with acquisitions
Diversify into shares or superannuation structures
High-growth speculative investing becomes less tax-effective under the proposed model.
3. Existing Investors Are Mostly Protected
One of the biggest questions leading into the Budget was:
“Will current investors lose their existing tax benefits?”
At this stage, the answer appears to be largely no.
Current proposals suggest:
Existing properties will be protected under grandfathering rules
Investors who already own negatively geared properties should retain existing benefits
Transitional arrangements may apply for purchases completed before July 2027
This is politically significant because:
Around 2.2 million Australians own investment properties
Nearly 90% own only one or two properties
Most investors are everyday “mum and dad” Australians rather than large institutional landlords.
4. New Builds Could Boom
This Budget strongly favours:
Developers
New apartment projects
Construction-led housing supply
The Government’s objective is clear: redirect investor capital toward creating additional homes instead of competing over existing stock.
Potential Winners
The changes could benefit:
Developers
Builders
Project marketers
Off-the-plan sales businesses
Growth corridors with strong housing pipelines
This may create increased demand for:
New apartments
House-and-land estates
Build-to-rent developments
5. Property Prices Could Soften Slightly
Treasury modelling suggests:
House price growth may slow by around 2%
Investor demand for established homes could weaken
First-home buyers may gain improved access to the market
However, most economists are not forecasting a property crash.
The more likely outcome is:
Slower price growth
Softer investor demand
A more segmented market between: New builds and Established homes
6. Rental Market Risks Remain
Critics argue the reforms may create unintended consequences.
Concerns include:
Fewer investors entering the market
Reduced rental supply
Rising rents if landlords exit the sector
Housing shortages worsening if construction cannot accelerate fast enough
Supporters argue:
The reforms are relatively moderate
Grandfathering reduces the risk of investor panic
Incentives for new housing supply may offset rental pressures over time
Other Key Property Takeaways from the Budget
Additional announcements include:
The foreign buyer ban on established homes has been extended to mid-2029
A new 30% minimum tax on discretionary (family) trust income will apply from July 2028
Inflation is forecast to hit 5% by mid-2026
Higher inflation increases the likelihood of further interest rate rises and tighter borrowing capacity
This means investors may also face:
Higher mortgage repayments
Reduced serviceability
Stricter lending conditions
Increased holding costs
What Property Investors Should Be Thinking About Now
Existing Investors
For current property owners:
Immediate impacts appear limited
Grandfathering protections look strong
Holding quality assets may still deliver long-term benefits
Future Investors
For new entrants to the market:
New builds may become significantly more attractive
Cash flow and rental yield will matter more than ever
Tax strategy will need to evolve
Borrowing capacity and interest rate management will become increasingly important